Kent v. Maryland Transp Authority ( 2007 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1043
DIANE M. KENT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; LIEUTENANT
DANA WHITT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:06-cv-02351-CCB)
Submitted: May 30, 2007 Decided: July 9, 2007
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Diane M. Kent, Appellant Pro Se. Gisele Marie Mathews, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Diane M. Kent appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint against her former employer and supervisor
under the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654(2000) (“FMLA”). A motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(b)(6) should be granted only if, after accepting all
well-pleaded allegations in the complaint as true, it appears
certain that the plaintiff cannot prove any set of facts in support
of her claim entitling her to relief. Edwards v. City of
Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 244 (4th Cir. 1999). We have thoroughly
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kent v. Maryland
Transp. Auth., No. 1:06-cv-02351-CCB (D. Md. Dec. 21, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decision making process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -