Bowers v. Astrue ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                                                 Filed:   July 29, 2008
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-1546
    (3:05-cv-03477-JRM)
    THURMOND B. BOWERS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social
    Security,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    O R D E R
    The court amends its opinion filed June 20, 2008, as follows:
    On the cover sheet, attorney information section -- the name
    of Carolyn Cooper, Special Assistant United States Attorney, is
    added as counsel for Appellee.
    For the Court - By Direction
    /s/ Patricia S. Connor
    Clerk
    UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-1546
    THURMOND B. BOWERS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL J.   ASTRUE,   Commissioner   of   Social
    Security,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge.
    (3:05-cv-03477-JRM)
    Submitted:   February 12, 2008                Decided:   June 20, 2008
    Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Robertson H. Wendt, Jr., LAW OFFICES OF ROBERTSON WENDT, North
    Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Deana R. Ertl-Lombardi,
    Regional Chief Counsel, Yvette G. Keesee, Deputy Regional Chief
    Counsel, Thomas S. Inman, Assistant Regional Counsel, Carolyn
    Cooper, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Denver, Colorado,
    for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Thurmond B. Bowers appeals the magistrate judge’s order
    upholding the denial of his application for disability insurance
    benefits.*       We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
    error.     Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
    magistrate judge.        See Bowers v. Astrue, No. 3:05-cv-03477-JRM
    (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2007).        We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts    and    legal   contentions   are     adequately   presented    in   the
    materials      before   the   court   and     argument   would   not   aid   the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    The parties consented to referral to a magistrate judge for
    final disposition under 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (c) (2000).
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-1546

Filed Date: 7/29/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021