Calister Simangwi v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 554 F. App'x 217 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 13-1483
    CALISTER SIMANGWI,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals.
    Submitted:   February 4, 2014               Decided:   February 12, 2014
    Before SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per
    curiam opinion.
    Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,
    Maryland, for Petitioner.   Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney
    General, Song Park, Senior Litigation Counsel, Joseph A.
    O’Connell, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Calister Simangwi, a native and citizen of Cameroon,
    petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals    (“Board”)     denying       her       motion    to    reopen.         We   have
    reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and
    find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the
    motion to reopen as untimely and number-barred.                           See 8 C.F.R.
    § 1003.2(c)(2)     (2013).        We    therefore         deny    the    petition      for
    review in part for the reasons stated by the Board.                            See In re:
    Simangwi (B.I.A. Mar. 13, 2013).                 We lack jurisdiction to review
    the   Board’s    refusal   to    exercise         its    sua    sponte    authority     to
    reopen and therefore dismiss this portion of the petition for
    review.    See Mosere v. Mukasey, 
    552 F.3d 397
    , 400-01 (4th Cir.
    2009).     We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions     are    adequately         presented      in     the    materials
    before    this   court   and    argument         would    not    aid    the    decisional
    process.
    PETITION DENIED IN PART
    AND DISMISSED IN PART
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-1483

Citation Numbers: 554 F. App'x 217

Judges: Shedd, Floyd, Hamilton

Filed Date: 2/12/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024