Brown v. Ozmint , 232 F. App'x 360 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-6200
    JERRY BROWN,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JON   OZMINT,  Director,   South  Carolina
    Department of Corrections; HENRY MCMASTER,
    Attorney General of the State of South
    Carolina; WARDEN, MacDougall Correctional
    Institution,
    Respondents - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.   David C. Norton, District Judge.
    (3:06-cv-03013-DCN)
    Submitted:   June 20, 2007                 Decided:   July 12, 2007
    Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit
    Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jerry Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jerry Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
    as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition.            The order is not
    appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate
    of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of
    appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the
    denial of a constitutional right.”         28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).
    A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable
    jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims
    by   the   district   court   is   debatable    or   wrong    and   that   any
    dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise
    debatable.    Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003);
    Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).        We have independently reviewed the
    record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
    appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-6200

Citation Numbers: 232 F. App'x 360

Judges: Williams, Wilkinson, Motz

Filed Date: 7/12/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024