Owaiian Jones v. The Supreme Court of Virginia ( 2014 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7396
OWAIIAN M. JONES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA; THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT, Western District of Virginia, Roanoke Division;
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; GOVERNOR OF
VIRGINIA; MAYOR OF CITY OF ROANOKE,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 14-7400
OWAIIAN M. JONES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ROANOKE CITY CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES; STATE OF VIRGINIA;
WILLIAM BROADHURST; CHARLES DORSEY; JOHN DOES; TIMOTHY
ALLEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 14-7401
OWAIIAN M. JONES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ROANOKE CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; ROANOKE CITY JAIL; ROANOKE
CITY JAIL PHYSICIAN; JOHN DOES; TIMOTHY ALLEN; DR. ALI,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 14-7487
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WALTER L. DAVIS, SR.; EDWARD L. JENKINS; DEPUTY LEE,
Roanoke City Sheriff Office; JOHN DOES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
Judge. (7:14-cv-00416-MFU-RSB; 7:14-cv-00408-MFU-RSB;
7:14-cv-00415-MFU-RSB; 7:14-cv-00502-MFU-RSB)
Submitted: December 16, 2014 Decided: December 19, 2014
Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Owaiian M. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Owaiian M. Jones appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his complaints for failure to comply with the court
orders. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Jones v. The Supreme Court of Virginia, No.
7:14-cv-00416-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2014); Jones v. Roanoke
City Circuit Court, No. 7:14-cv-00408-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 29,
2014); Jones v. Ronaoke City Sheriff’s Office, No.
7:14-cv-00415-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2014); Jones v. Davis,
No. 7:14-cv-00502-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3