B.G. v. Sam Malhotra ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 16-1837
    B.G., By Her Next Friend B.G.,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    SAM MALHOTRA, In his Official Capacity as Secretary of the
    Maryland Department of Human Resources; PETER BUESGENS, In
    His Official Capacity as Director of the Worcester County
    Department of Social Services; TERESA WALLER, In Her
    Individual and Official Capacity Worcester County Department
    of Social Services; SHAE NOTTINGHAM, In Her Individual and
    Official Capacity Worcester County Department of Social
    Services; KIMBERLY LINTON, In Her Individual and Official
    Capacity Worcester County Department of Social Services,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:15-cv-02663-RDB)
    Submitted:   February 23, 2017            Decided:   February 27, 2017
    Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Robert McCaig, LEGAL AID BUREAU, INC., Salisbury, Maryland, for
    Appellant.   Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General, Ann M. Sheridan,
    Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    B.G.,      by   her    next    friend,     B.G.,       appeals     the    district
    court’s     order     denying     relief   on    her    42   U.S.C.      § 1983   (2012)
    complaint challenging a state court child custody proceeding.
    We   have    reviewed       the   record   and     find      no    reversible     error.
    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
    court.      B.G. v. Malhotra, No. 1:15-cv-02663-RDB (D. Md. June 20,
    2016).      We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions        are   adequately      presented        in   the    materials
    before    this    court     and   argument      would    not      aid   the   decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-1837

Filed Date: 2/27/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021