Jackson v. Smith , 212 F. App'x 161 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 06-6308
    JERRY JACKSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    J. V. SMITH, Warden; J. SERRANO, MD; L.
    ROGERS, I.C.C.I.D.P.; K. WALKER, PA; A. SAHA,
    PA; H. WATTS, Board of Appeals; JOHN L.
    LAMANNA, Warden; LOUISA FUERTES-ROSARIO; FNU
    SERO,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (6:04-cv-02190-GRA)
    Submitted:   November 27, 2006            Decided:   December 7, 2006
    Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jerry Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jerry Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying
    relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
    Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 
    403 U.S. 388
     (1971).   The
    district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to
    
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (b)(1)(B) (2000).   The magistrate judge recommended
    that relief be denied and advised Jackson that failure to file
    timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate
    review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.
    Despite this warning, Jackson failed to file timely objections to
    the magistrate judge’s recommendation.
    The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
    judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of
    the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been
    warned of the consequences of noncompliance.    Wright v. Collins,
    
    766 F.2d 841
    , 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 
    474 U.S. 140
     (1985). Jackson has waived appellate review by failing to
    timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice.
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-6308

Citation Numbers: 212 F. App'x 161

Judges: Wilkinson, Traxler, Shedd

Filed Date: 12/7/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024