Crowder v. Davis ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-7395
    KENNETH WAYNE CROWDER,
    Petitioner – Appellant,
    v.
    KEITH L. DAVIS, Warden, Deerfield Correctional Center,
    Respondent – Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.   Liam O’Grady, District
    Judge. (1:09-cv-00321-LO-TRJ)
    Submitted:    December 15, 2009             Decided:   December 18, 2009
    Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Kenneth Wayne Crowder, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Kenneth     Wayne    Crowder      seeks    to    appeal    the    district
    court’s order dismissing as untimely his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2006)
    petition.     The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice
    or judge issues a certificate of appealability.                        See 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2006).          A certificate of appealability will not
    issue   absent      “a   substantial        showing      of     the     denial      of     a
    constitutional      right.”         
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)       (2006).           A
    prisoner      satisfies      this        standard      by      demonstrating            that
    reasonable     jurists      would    find      that    any     assessment          of     the
    constitutional      claims    by    the    district      court    is    debatable          or
    wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district
    court   is    likewise      debatable.          See     Miller-El       v.    Cockrell,
    
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    ,
    484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).
    We   have    independently       reviewed      the    record    and    conclude          that
    Crowder has not made the requisite showing.                           Accordingly, we
    deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.                               We
    dispense     with    oral    argument       because      the     facts       and        legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-7395

Filed Date: 12/18/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014