Khaliq v. Jones ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 95-7200
    JAME' ABDULLAH KHALIQ,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PERCY JONES, Sergeant; FRANK MOSES, Correc-
    tional Officer; ANTHONY BROWN, Correctional
    Officer,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    No. 95-7201
    JAME' ABDULLAH KHALIQ,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GERALDINE MIRO, Warden; MARY MILLER, Lieuten-
    ant; D. K. WASHINGTON, Lieutenant; V. MOLE,
    Sergeant; JAMES BROOKER, Correctional Officer;
    COLVIN MANER, Correctional Officer; DWAYNE
    WASHINGTON, Correctional Officer; E. JENKINS,
    Correctional Officer; TODD JONES, Correctional
    Officer; LIEUTENANT BEST; S. ALDRISH, Correc-
    tional Officer,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-94-2857-2-17AJ, CA-95-96-2-17AJ)
    Submitted:    January 18, 1996                Decided:    February 1, 1996
    Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jame' Abdullah Khaliq, Appellant Pro Se. John Gregg McMaster, Jr.,
    TOMPKINS & MCMASTER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant   appeals    from   the    district    court's   orders
    denying relief on his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (1988) complaints. We have
    reviewed the records and the district court's opinions accepting
    the magistrate judge's recommendations and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Khaliq v. Jones, No. CA-94-2857-2-17AJ; Khaliq v. Miro,
    No. CA-95-96-2-17AJ (D.S.C. June 29, 1995). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-7200

Filed Date: 2/1/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021