King v. Lee ( 2004 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7211
LESLIE CLAY KING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBEY C. LEE; SHERRY MCFEATERS; JANE DOE,
a/k/a R. Mac; DONALD LISH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-04-414-1-H)
Submitted: November 3, 2004 Decided: December 13, 2004
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leslie Clay King, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Leslie Clay King appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action as frivolous pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
King v. Lee, No. CA-04-414-1-H (E.D.N.C. July 7, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -