United States v. Henoud , 272 F. App'x 266 ( 2008 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7439
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOHN MAURICE HENOUD, a/k/a John Harvey, a/k/a J.M. Harvey,
a/k/a J.M. Hardey, a/k/a Jerry Geohn Davidson,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:04-cr-00004-JBF-1)
Submitted: March 19, 2008 Decided: April 7, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Maurice Henoud, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Calvin Moore,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John Maurice Henoud appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to compel the return of a computer hard drive
seized as evidence pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). We review
the denial of a Rule 41(g) motion for return of property for an
abuse of discretion. United States v. Chambers, 192 F.3d 374, 376
(3d Cir. 1999). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of
discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.* See United States v. Henoud, No.
2:04-cr-00004-JBF-1 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 10, 2007; entered
Sept. 11, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
We also deny without prejudice Henoud’s request that this
court direct the district court to consolidate his various cases
that are or may be pending; Henoud should seek such relief in the
first instance from the district court.
- 2 -