Stroman v. McMaster ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-7834
    SAMMIE STROMAN,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER; BERNARD MCKIE, Warden of Kirkland
    Correctional Institution,
    Respondents - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill.     Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
    District Judge. (0:08-cv-03402-PMD)
    Submitted:    January 19, 2010               Decided:   January 28, 2010
    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Sammie Stroman, Appellant Pro Se.     Donald John Zelenka, Deputy
    Assistant   Attorney  General,   Melody   Jane  Brown,  Assistant
    Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Sammie Stroman seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2006) petition.                              The
    order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues
    a certificate of appealability.                 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2006).
    A    certificate       of    appealability        will    not     issue     absent     “a
    substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
    
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)        (2006).        A    prisoner      satisfies      this
    standard   by    demonstrating           that   reasonable      jurists     would    find
    that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district
    court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural
    ruling by the district court is likewise debatable.                          Miller-El
    v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th
    Cir.   2001).         We    have   independently        reviewed      the   record    and
    conclude      that    Stroman      has    not    made    the    requisite     showing.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss
    the appeal.          We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before   the    court       and    argument     would    not    aid   the   decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-7834

Judges: Niemeyer, King, Davis

Filed Date: 1/28/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024