Tennant v. McBride , 157 F. App'x 630 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 05-7353
    RALPH RAY TENNANT, JR.,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    THOMAS MCBRIDE, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
    District Judge. (CA-04-251-1-FPS)
    Submitted:   November 21, 2005            Decided:   December 8, 2005
    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ralph Ray Tennant, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West
    Virginia, for Appellee
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Ralph Ray Tennant, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
    court’s judgment adopting and affirming the magistrate judge’s
    report and recommendation and denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000) petition.               The order is not appealable unless a
    circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).             A certificate of appealability will
    not   issue    absent    “a    substantial       showing    of    the   denial       of   a
    constitutional right.”          
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2) (2000).             A prisoner
    satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists
    would   find    both    that    the    district    court’s       assessment     of    his
    constitutional      claims      is     debatable     or     wrong    and      that    any
    dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also
    debatable or wrong.            See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    ,
    336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v.
    Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).                  We have independently
    reviewed the record and conclude Tennant has not made the requisite
    showing.      Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
    dismiss the appeal.           We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts   and    legal    contentions      are     adequately      presented      in    the
    materials      before   the     court    and     argument    would      not    aid    the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-7353

Citation Numbers: 157 F. App'x 630

Judges: Luttig, Williams, Shedd

Filed Date: 12/8/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024