Maree-Bey v. Nash , 53 F. App'x 240 ( 2002 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7419
THOMAS E. MAREE-BEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOHN NASH, Warden, FCI Schuylkill,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
02-2584-CCB)
Submitted: November 20, 2002 Decided: December 16, 2002
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas E. Maree-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Thomas E. Maree-Bey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order dismissing without prejudice his petition filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court.* See Maree-Bey v. Nash, No. CA-02-2584-CCB (D. Md.
filed Sept. 10, 2002 & entered Sept. 11, 2002). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Maree-Bey suggests in his informal brief to this court that
he is unable to complete administrative exhaustion of his claim
because he has been paroled from custody. However, the applicable
regulations apply “to former inmates for issues that arose during
their confinement.” 28 C.F.R. § 542.10(b) (2002). Therefore,
Maree-Bey must complete the exhaustion process before pursuing his
claim in federal court.
2