McNeil v. Scotland County , 53 F. App'x 242 ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-1707
    LENORA MCNEIL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SCOTLAND   COUNTY,    a   body   politic   and
    incorporated,
    Defendant - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
    District Judge. (CA-01-388-1)
    Submitted:   November 22, 2002         Decided:     December 18, 2002
    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    James H. Locus, Jr., Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellant.
    Cecil W. Harrison, Jr., David L. Woodard, POYNER & SPRUILL, L.L.P.,
    Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Lenora McNeil appeals the district court’s order granting
    summary judgment in her former employer’s favor on her claims of
    employment discrimination.         We have reviewed the parties’ briefs,*
    the joint appendix, and the district court’s opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
    the district court.       See McNeil v. Scotland County, 
    213 F. Supp. 2d 559
     (M.D.N.C. 2002).          We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts    and   legal    contentions    are   adequately   presented    in   the
    materials      before   the    court   and   argument   would   not   aid   the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    In her appellate and reply briefs, McNeil raises claims of
    a hostile work environment and “continuing violations” of
    discrimination.   This Court generally does not address claims
    raised for the first time on appeal. First Va. Banks, Inc. v. BP
    Exploration & Oil Inc., 
    206 F.3d 404
    , 407 n.1 (4th Cir. 2000)
    (declining to consider issues raised for first time on appeal). We
    also find that McNeil has abandoned her wrongful discharge claim
    under the North Carolina Equal Employment Practices Act by failing
    to raise it in her brief. Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 
    178 F.3d 231
    , 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999) (noting that issues not briefed or
    argued are deemed abandoned).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-1707

Citation Numbers: 53 F. App'x 242

Judges: Niemeyer, Luttig, King

Filed Date: 12/18/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024