United States v. Hall , 53 F. App'x 246 ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-7550
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DIRK AMEEN HALL, a/k/a Luke,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham.    James A. Beaty, Jr.,
    District Judge. (CR-98-322, CA-01-1118-1)
    Submitted:   December 9, 2002          Decided:     December 18, 2002
    Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Dirk Ameen Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Albert Jamison Lang,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina,
    for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Dirk Ameen Hall appeals the district court’s order denying his
    motion to reconsider a previous order dismissing Hall’s motion to
    vacate, 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
     (2000).* We review the denial of a Fed. R.
    Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration for abuse of discretion.
    United States v. Holland, 
    214 F.3d 523
    , 527 (4th Cir. 2000).
    Because Hall’s motion stated no viable ground for relief under the
    rule, we find no abuse of discretion.        Accordingly we affirm the
    order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials   before   the   court   and   argument   would   not   aid   the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    We note that we lack jurisdiction to review the underlying
    order denying Hall’s § 2255 motion because Hall did not appeal the
    order within sixty days of its entry, see Fed. R. App. P.
    4(a)(1)(B); Panhorst v. United States, 
    241 F.3d 367
    , 370 (4th Cir.
    2001), and the Rule 60(b) motion did not toll the time for filing
    an appeal. See Browder v. Director, Illinois Dep’t of Corr., 
    434 U.S. 257
    , 263 n.7 (1978).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-7550

Citation Numbers: 53 F. App'x 246

Judges: Williams, King, Hamilton

Filed Date: 12/18/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024