Glendora v. Walker , 53 F. App'x 254 ( 2002 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2049
GLENDORA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN M. WALKER; ROSEANN B. MACKECHNE; TYNETTA
HOPE; HELENA M. HARRIS; THOMAS F. HOGAN;
DENISE KELLEY; KEVIN SMITH; JOSEPH N.
ALEXANDER, JR.; COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY; NANCY
M. MAYER-WHITTINGTON; MARY M. SCHROEDER; CATHY
A. CATTERSON; GWEN BAPTISTE; KAREN MURPHY;
CHIEF CLERK, NASSAU SUPREME COURT; MOTION
CLERK; INTAKE CLERK; JOHN P. D’BLASI; BARRY
SKWIERSKI; GERALD STERN; LEE KIKLIER; ALBERT
LAWRENCE; NEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON
JUDICIAL CONDUCT; CITY OF NEW YORK; DEPARTMENT
OF FINANCE; COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE; BUREAU OF
PARKING VIOLATIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-02-471)
Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 19, 2002
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Glendora, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Glendora seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
her 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal as frivolous on
the reasoning of the district court. See Glendora v. Walker, No.
CA-02-471 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 13, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2