Shelton v. Angelone , 54 F. App'x 579 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 02-7310
    GEORGE R. SHELTON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia
    Department of Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. James E. Bradberry, Magistrate
    Judge. (CA-02-67-2)
    Submitted:    January 16, 2003               Decided:   January 23, 2003
    Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    George R. Shelton, Appellant Pro Se.     Robert H. Anderson, III,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    George R. Shelton seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
    report and recommendation.       This court may exercise jurisdiction
    only over final orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
     (2000), and certain
    interlocutory and collateral orders, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1292
     (2000); Fed.
    R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 
    337 U.S. 541
     (1949).    The order Shelton seeks to appeal is neither a final
    order    nor   an   appealable   interlocutory   or   collateral   order.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
    appeal for lack of jurisdiction.*        We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    *
    Even if Shelton’s notice of appeal was construed as
    appealing the district court’s November 6 order, dismissal would be
    appropriate. Shelton failed to file timely sufficient objections to
    the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and has therefore
    waived this Court’s review of the claims asserted in his § 2254
    petition.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-7310

Citation Numbers: 54 F. App'x 579

Judges: Williams, King, Gregory

Filed Date: 1/23/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024