United States v. Thomas ( 2003 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7891
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TERRENCE THOMAS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-
00-415-S, CA-02-3396-S)
Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 14, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrence Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa M. Turner, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Terrence Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)
and denying the motion for reconsideration. We have independently
reviewed the record and conclude that Thomas has not made a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See
Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. , 2003 WL 431659, at *10 (U.S.
Feb. 25, 2003) (No. 01-7662). Accordingly, we deny a certificate
of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)
(2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2