United States v. Propst ( 2003 )

PER CURIAM.

Ortez Antoinne Propst seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Propst, Nos. CR-91-119; CA-01-60-3-2 MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.