O'Hara v. Westfall ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                               UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 95-2566
    TERRA O'HARA,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SERGEANT WESTFALL, Marshall County, West
    Virginia, Sheriff Lightner's Sergeant; DEPUTY
    PHILLIPS, Marshall County, West Virginia,
    Sheriff Lightner's Deputy,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    MARSHALL COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA; SHERIFF
    LIGHTNER;   MARSHALL  COUNTY   SHERIFF'S
    DEPARTMENT,
    Defendants.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
    trict of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
    Chief District Judge. (CA-93-180-5-CV)
    Submitted:   April 17, 1997                 Decided:   April 24, 1997
    Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Terra O'Hara, Appellant Pro Se. George Monroe Schumann, DICKIE,
    MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE, P.C., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; John R. Cox,
    DICKIE, MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-
    cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. O'Hara
    v. Westfall, No. CA-93-180-5-CV (N.D.W. Va. July 21, 1995). We deny
    Appellant's motions for default judgment, for sanctions against De-
    fendant's counsel, to remand case, for appointment of counsel, "for
    A rule that Defendants - Appellees Show Cause," for an injunction,
    to strike Appellees' pleadings, "for Declaratory Judgment under 28
    USC 2201," "to Disqualify Judge Stamp," "to construe Title and Par-
    ties to Appeal," and to transfer case to district court. We grant
    Appellant's motion to expedite the appeal to the extent possible
    given the court's busy docket. We dispense with oral argument be-
    cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    2
    AFFIRMED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-2566

Filed Date: 4/24/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021