Cox v. Gaskins ( 2003 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6905
CLAUDIE RAY COX, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GREG GASKINS,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
WAYNE MELTON, Investigator; ALLEN JORDAN;
WAYLAND J. SERMONS, JR.; DENNIS M. KILCOYNE;
BARRY PURSER; DONNIE RAY MUTHERSPAW,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-01-936-H-5)
Submitted: September 9, 2003 Decided: October 22, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Claudie Ray Cox, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Allen Davis, WOMBLE,
CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Claudie Ray Cox, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cox v.
Gaskins, No. CA-01-936-H-5 (E.D.N.C. June 2, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2