United States v. Gibson , 80 F. App'x 875 ( 2003 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7063
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BERNARD GIBSON, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR-
94-454-PJM)
Submitted: September 10, 2003 Decided: November 17, 2003
Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard Gibson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stuart A. Berman, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Bernard Gibson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West 2000 &
Supp. 2003). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Gibson, No. CR-94-454-PJM (D.
Md. filed July 1, 2003; entered July 4, 2003). We deny as
unnecessary Gibson’s motion for general relief, in which he sought
a certificate of appealability, because Gibson’s appeal is not from
“the final order in a proceeding under [28 U.S.C.] section 2255.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2