United States v. Duhaney ( 1999 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7756
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GARFIELD AUGUSTINE DUHANEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-
97-92-S, CA-98-3122-S)
Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 1, 1999
Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Garfield Augustine Duhaney, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Garfield A. Duhaney appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West
1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af-
firm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v.
Duhaney, Nos. CR-97-92-S; CA-98-3122-S (D. Md. Sept. 15, 1998). We
deny Duhaney’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-
quately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2