United States v. Davis ( 1999 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6462
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROGER TRENTON DAVIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-91-137, CA-97-292-R)
Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 25, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger Trenton Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge Mott,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
The district court entered an order denying Davis’ 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2255 (West Supp. 1999) motion on March 17, 1998. On March 11,
1999, Davis moved for relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and
to file a late notice of appeal. The district court denied both
motions. Davis timely appealed. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-
cordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal based upon the reasoning of the district court. See United
States v. Davis, No. CA-97-292-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 19, 1999).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2