Barrett v. Sykes ( 1999 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6484
JAMES BARRETT, III, BEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ABDUR RAHMAN Y. SYKES; JEAN JOYNER; RANDALL
LEE; JAMES C. WILSON; EDWARD A. JACKSON; MACK
JARVIS; DANIEL L. STIENEKE; CHARLES K.
STEWART; HATTIE PIMPONG; JOHNNY W. TAYLOR,
III; HAROLD PERSON; WADE L. MOSELEY; ROBERT R.
NOWELL; HENRY D. GREGORY; OLIVER S. MUHAMMAD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-54)
Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 23, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Barrett, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James Barrett, III, appeals the district court’s order dis-
missing his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) as
frivolous under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (West 1994 & Supp.
1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss
the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Barrett v.
Sykes, No. CA-99-54 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 1999). We further deny
Barrett’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2