Rouse v. Tennis ( 2005 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6863
GERRY LEE ROUSE, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KERMIT TENNIS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (CA-05-266-2)
Submitted: October 20, 2005 Decided: October 27, 2005
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerry Lee Rouse, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Gerry Lee Rouse, Sr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to
state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rouse v.
Tennis, No. CA-05-266-2 (E.D. Va. May 27, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -