Vance v. Irby , 157 F. App'x 618 ( 2005 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6522
ROBERT EARL VANCE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NFN IRBY, Officer; NFN RHODES, Sergeant; J.
WILLIAMS, Sergeant; OFFICER MCDANIEL,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(CA-03-3826-8-27)
Submitted: August 22, 2005 Decided: December 7, 2005
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Earl Vance, Appellant Pro Se. William Benson Darwin, Jr.,
Ginger Dee Goforth, HOLCOMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, P.A.,
Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Robert Earl Vance appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Vance v. Irby,
No. CA-03-3826-8-27 (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -