Dubon v. Robinson , 159 F. App'x 511 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 05-7716
    JOSE ARNALDO DUBON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    DAVID ROBINSON, Warden, Wallens Ridge State
    Prison,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.   Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-05-137)
    Submitted: December 15, 2005              Decided:   December 22, 2005
    Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jose Arnaldo Dubon, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell,
    Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Jose Arnaldo Dubon seeks to appeal the district court’s
    final order denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000) petition
    and the order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion.        The orders
    are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a
    certificate of appealability.      
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).        A
    certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial
    showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”               
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)   (2000).   A   prisoner   satisfies   this    standard   by
    demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the
    district   court’s   assessment   of   the   constitutional    claims    is
    debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by
    the district court are also debatable or wrong.        See Miller-El v.
    Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).
    We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Dubon has
    not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate
    of appealability, and dismiss the appeal.        We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-7716

Citation Numbers: 159 F. App'x 511

Judges: Michael, Duncan, Hamilton

Filed Date: 12/22/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024