Ortega v. Johnson , 159 F. App'x 512 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 05-7576
    JASON ORTEGA,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    GENE M. JOHNSON, Director      of   the   Virginia
    Department of Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-04-694)
    Submitted: December 15, 2005                 Decided:   December 22, 2005
    Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Jason Ortega, Appellant Pro Se.     Williams W. Muse, Assistant
    Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Jason Ortega seeks to appeal the district court’s order
    dismissing his petition filed under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000).               An
    appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding
    unless   a    circuit   justice   or   judge   issues   a    certificate   of
    appealability.     
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).           A certificate of
    appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the
    denial of a constitutional right.”          
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2) (2000).
    A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable
    jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of his
    constitutional     claims   is    debatable    and   that   any   dispositive
    procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or
    wrong.       See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336 (2003);
    Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683 (4th Cir. 2001).          We have independently reviewed the
    record and conclude that Ortega has not made the requisite showing.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
    appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-7576

Citation Numbers: 159 F. App'x 512

Judges: Michael, Duncan, Hamilton

Filed Date: 12/22/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024