Harsy v. Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. , 704 F. App'x 243 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                     UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 17-1879
    NATHANAEL HARSY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    MID-AMERICA APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC.; MID-AMERICA
    APARTMENTS, L.P.; MIDWAY SERVICES, INC.,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
    Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00087-LO-JFA)
    Submitted: November 21, 2017                                Decided: November 27, 2017
    Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Nathanael Harsy, Appellant Pro Se. Laura W. Hays, LYNCH, CORNETT, HAYES &
    SELI, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; David Patrick Corrigan, Melissa Yvonne York,
    HARMAN CLAYTOR CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, P.C., Glen Allen, Virginia, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Nathanael Harsy seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as without
    merit his civil complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the
    notice of appeal was not timely filed.
    Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or
    order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the
    appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.
    App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
    requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007).
    The district court’s order was entered on the docket on June 23, 2017. Harsy filed
    the notice of appeal on July 25, 2017. Because Harsy failed to file a timely notice of
    appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-1879

Citation Numbers: 704 F. App'x 243

Judges: Wynn, Thacker, Hamilton

Filed Date: 11/27/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024