United States v. Bailey , 54 F. App'x 161 ( 2003 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7666
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIE BAILEY, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CR-99-55, CR-99-97, CA-01-1037-1)
Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: January 7, 2003
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Bailey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Patrick Auld, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Willie Bailey, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have
reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district
court that Bailey has not made a substantial showing of the denial
of a constitutional right. See United States v. Bailey, Nos. CR-
99-55; CR-99-97; CA-01-1037-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Aug. 30, 2002 &
entered Sept. 3, 2002). Accordingly, we deny Bailey’s motion for
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2