Grethen v. Johnson ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 06-7630
    MARK A. GRETHEN,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    GENE M. JOHNSON,     Director,   Department    of
    Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
    Judge. (2:06-cv-00052-RBS)
    Submitted:   February 26, 2007                Decided:   March 7, 2007
    Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Mark A. Grethen, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF
    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Mark A. Grethen seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000) petition.                The order
    is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a
    certificate of appealability.        
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).             A
    certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial
    showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”                      
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)   (2000).   A   prisoner     satisfies     this    standard     by
    demonstrating    that   reasonable     jurists    would     find       that   any
    assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is
    debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by
    the district court is likewise debatable.         Miller-El v. Cockrell,
    
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484
    (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).               We have
    independently reviewed the record and conclude that Grethen has not
    made the requisite showing.     Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal.             Additionally, we deny
    Grethen’s motion to remand. We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials   before   the   court   and     argument   would      not    aid   the
    decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-7630

Judges: Wilkinson, Michael, Motz

Filed Date: 3/7/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024