Ward v. Beaufort County Detention Center , 258 F. App'x 614 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-6952
    JOSEPH GRAYSON WARD,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    BEAUFORT COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; SILENT
    KNIGHT COMPANY, Fire Alarm Sound Device
    Manufacturer; TONY BUSH, Jail Doctor; COASTAL
    EMPIRE   FIRE  AND   SECURITY,   INCORPORATED,
    Computer System-Fire Alarm System Installation
    Contractor; INTEGRATOR; MARK FITZGIBBONS, Jail
    Administrator,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
    (2:04-cv-00792-RBH)
    Submitted:   December 13, 2007         Decided:     December 19, 2007
    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Joseph Grayson Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Hodges Waldron,
    Jr., CAROLINA LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, LLC, Bluffton, South Carolina;
    John K. Blincow, Jr., TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, PA,
    Charleston, South Carolina; Hal A. Shillingstad, FLYNN, GASKINS &
    BENNETT, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Thomas Chester Hildebrand, Jr.,
    HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER & BOYD, PA, Charleston, South Carolina; Morris
    Dawes Cooke, Jr., BARNWELL, WHALEY, PATTERSON     &   HELMS,   LLC,
    Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    - 2 -
    PER CURIAM:
    Joseph Grayson Ward appeals the district court’s order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.*   We have reviewed
    the record and find no reversible error.    Accordingly, we affirm
    for the reasons stated by the district court.       Ward v. Beaufort
    County Det. Ctr., No. 2:04-cv-00792-RBH (D.S.C. May 18, 2007).    We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    *
    In his informal brief and informal reply brief, Ward asserts
    error only in the district court’s denial of relief on his claims
    against defendants Beaufort County Detention Center and Mark
    Fitzgibbons. Accordingly, he has waived review of the denial of
    relief against the other defendants. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The
    Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal
    brief.”).
    - 3 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-6952

Citation Numbers: 258 F. App'x 614

Judges: Niemeyer, Motz, Shedd

Filed Date: 12/19/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024