Azubuko v. Dorchester District Court ( 2006 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2275
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DORCHESTER DISTRICT COURT FOR MASSACHUSETTS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-403-1)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 27, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chukwuma E. Azubuko, Appellant Pro Se. Sookyoung Shin, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2000). We have reviewed the record and
find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Azubuko v. Dorchester Dist. Court, No. CA-04-403-1 (E.D. Va. filed
Oct. 24, 2005 & entered Oct. 25, 2005). Further, we conclude that
the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
Azubuko’s motions to reconsider, for new trial, and to vacate. See
United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 204 (4th Cir. 2003)
(“District court decisions granting or denying [Fed. R. Civ. P.]
60(b) relief are reviewed for abuse of discretion. . . .”). We
deny Azubuko’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -