United States v. Simpson ( 2006 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6291
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ALTON LEE SIMPSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:99-cr-00127-BO-3)
Submitted: September 22, 2006 Decided: October 13, 2006
Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alton Lee Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Frank DeArmon Whitney, United
States Attorney, Steve R. Matheny, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Alton Lee Simpson appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion claiming the court improperly delegated
authority to the Bureau of Prisons to set a payment schedule
pursuant to the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program for
repaying restitution and denying his motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the district court’s orders and the record and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United
States v. Simpson, No. 5:99-cr-00127-BO-3 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 2005;
Jan. 31, 2006). Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
does not entitle Simpson to relief as there was no clerical error.
Relief was not available to Simpson in a motion for reconsideration
or by filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -