-
PER CURIAM: David Atkins, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Atkins v. Med. Dep’t of Middle River Reg’l Jail, No. 7:06-cv-00636-GEC, 2007 WL 2029304 (W.D.Va. July 10, 2007). Atkins’ motions *559 for appointment of counsel, for trial by jury, and for a new trial and for judgment as a matter of law, and his request to reargue are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Document Info
Docket Number: 07-7097
Citation Numbers: 260 F. App'x 558
Judges: Michael, King, Hamilton
Filed Date: 12/27/2007
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2024