Arbogast v. United States , 35 F.2d 1015 ( 1929 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    After a careful consideration of the record herein, we do not think that any of the assignments of error has sufficient merit to justify discussion. The question in the case was a question of fact, which has been resolved against defendant by the jury. There- was no error in the rulings of the court, and its judgment will accordingly be affirmed.

    Affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 2917

Citation Numbers: 35 F.2d 1015, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3139

Filed Date: 11/18/1929

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/4/2024