United States v. Blagrove ( 2010 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7716
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY A. BLAGROVE, a/k/a Tony,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (2:95-cr-00052-RGD-1)
Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony A. Blagrove, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony A. Blagrove appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Blagrove, No. 2:95-cr-00052-RGD-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 24, 2009). We
further deny Blagrove’s motion for documents in his brother’s
district court case. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2