Washington v. Johnson , 291 F. App'x 529 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 08-6732
    MILFORD WASHINGTON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of
    Corrections,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
    Judge. (2:07-cv-00293-RBS-TEM)
    Submitted:   August 14, 2008                 Decided:   August 21, 2008
    Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judges.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Milford Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Josephine Frances Whalen,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Milford Washington seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2000) petition.                 The order
    is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a
    certificate of appealability.           See 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2000).
    A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial
    showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”                       
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)   (2000).        A   prisoner    satisfies      this   standard    by
    demonstrating    that    reasonable          jurists   would     find   that     any
    assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is
    debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by
    the   district   court     is       likewise    debatable.        See   Miller-El
    v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th Cir.
    2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
    Washington has not made the requisite showing.                   Accordingly, we
    deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.                       We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-6732

Citation Numbers: 291 F. App'x 529

Judges: Michael, Wilkins, Hamilton

Filed Date: 8/21/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024