Asemani v. Attorney General of the United States , 292 F. App'x 248 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                                UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 07-7734
    BILLY G. ASEMANI,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES; SECRETARY OF THE
    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
    Respondents - Appellees.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:07-cv-02969-RDB)
    Submitted:   August 25, 2008              Decided:   September 8, 2008
    Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Billy G. Asemani seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
     (2000) petition.
    Asemani seeks a declaration that the Attorney General is the proper
    respondent in his § 2241 proceedings.          In the underlying petition,
    he requested that the Attorney General notify the Maryland State
    Division of Corrections that Asemani will not be taken into federal
    custody for removal purposes following completion of his state
    sentence because he is a United States national.                    He denies,
    however, that his § 2241 petition is an effort to seek review of
    his removal proceedings, and he seeks no relief from Maryland
    prison    officials.       Because    the   relief   sought    by   Asemani   is
    inextricably intertwined with his removal proceedings, and the
    district court did not have jurisdiction over those proceedings, it
    properly declined to issue an advisory opinion regarding the proper
    respondent or Asemani’s nationality.           Accordingly, we affirm the
    district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts    and    legal   contentions   are   adequately   presented      in    the
    materials      before   the   court   and   argument   would    not   aid     the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-7734

Citation Numbers: 292 F. App'x 248

Judges: Motz, Duncan, Wilkins

Filed Date: 9/8/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024