Shi Hui Zheng v. Gonzales , 194 F. App'x 111 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 05-2150
    SHI HUI ZHENG,
    Petitioner,
    versus
    ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
    Respondent.
    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
    Appeals. (A79-814-631)
    Submitted:   July 28, 2006                 Decided:   August 16, 2006
    Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Shi Hui Zheng, Petitioner Pro Se. James Arthur Hunolt, M. Jocelyn
    Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Office of Immigration Litigation,
    Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
    D.C., for Respondent.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Shi Hui Zheng, a native and citizen of the People’s
    Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
    Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming the immigration judge’s
    denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings.             This court’s
    review   of   the   denial   of   a    motion   to   reopen    is   extremely
    deferential, and the decision will not be reversed absent abuse of
    discretion.     Barry v. Gonzales, 
    445 F.3d 741
    , 744-45 (4th Cir.
    2006).   Motions to reopen are disfavored.       INS v. Doherty, 
    502 U.S. 314
    , 323 (1992).    We find no abuse of discretion in the immigration
    judge’s conclusion that Zheng failed to establish exceptional
    circumstances       warranting    reopening.           See      8    U.S.C.A.
    § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(I), (e)(1) (West 2005 & Supp. 2006). Accordingly,
    we deny Zheng’s motion for stay as moot and deny the petition for
    review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-2150

Citation Numbers: 194 F. App'x 111

Judges: Niemeyer, Shedd, Hamilton

Filed Date: 8/16/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024