Jones v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission , 194 F. App'x 114 ( 2006 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2368
JAMES A. JONES, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING
COMMISSION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-04-1818-8)
Submitted: June 14, 2006 Decided: August 17, 2006
Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A. Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Charles Dickerson,
MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION, Riverdale,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James A. Jones, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act of
1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (2000), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), and the
Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Jones v. Maryland-Nat’l Capital Park & Planning Comm’n,
No. CA-04-1818-8 (D. Md. Oct. 31, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -