In re: Dudley v. , 196 F. App'x 227 ( 2006 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6452
In Re: SEAN LAMONT DUDLEY, a/k/a John D.
Brown,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(5:99-cv-00152)
Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 30, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sean Lamont Dudley, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Sean Lamont Dudley petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court unduly delayed acting on his August
2004 motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing
the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s
docket sheet reveals that the district court recently entered a
final judgment on Dudley’s motion for consideration. See Dudley v.
United States, No. 5:99-cv-00152 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 2006).
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis,
we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -