-
PER CURIAM. George Lynch seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Lynch has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Lynch, Nos. CR-00-103; CA-02-764-A (E.D.Va. Aug. 29, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the ap
*584 peal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.DISMISSED.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 02-7416
Citation Numbers: 54 F. App'x 583
Filed Date: 1/23/2003
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/6/2024