United States v. Ballestero ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                             UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 06-4319
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ROBERT BALLESTERO, a/k/a Rico,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Huntington.  Robert C. Chambers,
    District Judge. (3:05-cr-00183)
    Submitted:   September 29, 2006           Decided:   October 18, 2006
    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Tim C. Carrico, CARRICO LAW OFFICES, LC, Charleston, West Virginia,
    for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, R.
    Gregory McVey, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West
    Virginia, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).
    PER CURIAM:
    Robert    Ballestero    pled    guilty   to   distributing     crack
    cocaine (Count Three) and being a felon in possession of a firearm
    (Count    Four)   and     was   sentenced    to   eighty-seven      months    of
    imprisonment.        On   appeal,   he   argues   that    the   district   court
    improperly gave him six criminal history points for two Michigan
    convictions: (1) breaking without entering, and (2) receiving and
    concealing stolen property, which occurred more than fifteen years
    prior to the commencement of his instant offenses in violation of
    U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.2(e) (2005).                   For the
    reasons that follow, we affirm.
    We review a district court’s factual findings concerning
    sentencing factors for clear error and its legal determinations de
    novo.    United States v. France, 
    164 F.3d 203
    , 209 (4th Cir. 1998).
    We find no error in the district court’s conclusion that Ballestero
    was serving sentences of imprisonment for these two state offenses
    during the relevant fifteen-year period as discussed in USSG
    § 4A1.2, comment. (n.2).        Accordingly, we affirm.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-4319

Judges: Wilkinson, Michael, Gregory

Filed Date: 10/18/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024