Davis v. Stevenson ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                              UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-7472
    CLIFTON L. DAVIS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    ROBERT STEVENSON, Warden, BRCI,
    Respondent - Appellee.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Beaufort.     G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (9:08-cv-03255-GRA)
    Submitted:   February 25, 2010              Decided:   March 3, 2010
    Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Clifton L. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy
    Assistant   Attorney  General,   Melody  Jane   Brown,  Assistant
    Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    PER CURIAM:
    Clifton L. Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s
    order denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2006) petition.
    The   district      court    referred       this    case   to    a    magistrate       judge
    pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (b)(1)(B) (2006).                              The magistrate
    judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Davis that
    failure      to      file         timely     specific       objections            to    this
    recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court
    order    based     upon     the    recommendation.         Despite         this    warning,
    Davis    failed     to    file      specific       objections    to       the    magistrate
    judge’s recommendation.
    The      timely        filing     of     specific        objections        to   a
    magistrate        judge’s     recommendation          is   necessary        to     preserve
    appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when
    the     parties      have      been        warned     of   the        consequences          of
    noncompliance.           Wright v. Collins, 
    766 F.2d 841
    , 845-46 (4th
    Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 
    474 U.S. 140
     (1985).                               Davis
    has     waived     appellate        review     by    failing     to       file     specific
    objections after receiving proper notice.                       Accordingly, we deny
    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal    contentions        are     adequately       presented       in    the    materials
    2
    before   the   court   and   argument   would   not   aid   the   decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-7472

Judges: Duncan, Agee, Hamilton

Filed Date: 3/3/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024