Harris v. McCall ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                 UNPUBLISHED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
    No. 09-8047
    RONNIE HARRIS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    MICHAEL MCCALL,
    Respondent - Appellee,
    and
    HENRY D. MCMASTER,
    Respondent.
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.    Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
    (3:09-cv-00948-HFF)
    Submitted:   February 25, 2010                Decided:   March 5, 2010
    Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Ronnie Harris, Appellant Pro Se.    Donald John Zelenka, Deputy
    Assistant Attorney General, Alphonso Simon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina,
    for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    2
    PER CURIAM:
    Ronnie           Harris    seeks       to    appeal    the     district    court’s
    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
    denying relief on his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     (2006) petition.                                       The
    order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues
    a certificate of appealability.                         
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1) (2006).
    A    certificate         of     appealability            will     not     issue     absent    “a
    substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
    
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(2)          (2006).            A     prisoner      satisfies      this
    standard    by     demonstrating            that    reasonable          jurists     would    find
    that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district
    court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural
    ruling by the district court is likewise debatable.                                  Miller-El
    v. Cockrell, 
    537 U.S. 322
    , 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    , 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 
    252 F.3d 676
    , 683-84 (4th
    Cir.    2001).          We    have    independently            reviewed       the   record   and
    conclude        that    Harris        has    not        made    the     requisite     showing.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss
    the appeal.            We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before    the     court       and     argument      would       not     aid   the   decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-8047

Judges: Duncan, Agee, Hamilton

Filed Date: 3/5/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024