Rose Paula Egbe v. Eric Holder, Jr. , 592 F. App'x 195 ( 2015 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1581
ROSE PAULA EGBE, a/k/a Rose Paula Likap,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: January 28, 2015 Decided: January 30, 2015
Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danielle Beach-Oswald, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOCIATES,
PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Joyce R. Branda, Acting
Assistant Attorney General, Michael C. Heyse, Acting Senior
Litigation Counsel, Laura M.L. Maroldy, Office of Immigration
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rose Paula Egbe, a native and citizen of Cameroon,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration
judge’s denial of her requests for asylum and withholding of
removal. * We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the
transcript of Egbe’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence.
We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling
contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8
U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence
supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502
U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Egbe (B.I.A. May 16,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
*
Egbe does not challenge the agency’s denial of her request
for protection under the Convention Against Torture.
Additionally, we lack jurisdiction over Egbe’s challenges to the
immigration judge’s adverse credibility determination on the
ground that she failed to exhaust her administrative remedies
before the Board. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (2012); Massis v.
Mukasey, 549 F.3d 631, 638-40 (4th Cir. 2008).
2