Edward Jeffus v. S. Hollembaek , 675 F. App'x 373 ( 2017 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7154
EDWARD DANE JEFFUS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
S. HOLLEMBAEK,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief
District Judge. (5:15-hc-02240-D)
Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Dane Jeffus, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edward Dane Jeffus appeals the district court’s order denying
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the court’s
dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. * We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Jeffus v.
Hollembaek, No. 5:15-hc-02240-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2016). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*To the extent that Jeffus appeals the district court’s
dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for failure to
prosecute, Jeffus’ claims are rendered moot by the district court’s
thorough consideration of his petition in its subsequent order
denying Jeffus’ Rule 60(b) motion.
2